The Changing Face of Electricity Supply Worldwide: Can NZ Compete?

Article extract from the September issue of Business Plus Magazine published by the EMA.

 

The Changing Face of Electricity Supply Worldwide: Can NZ Compete? 
By Richard Gardiner and Hans Buwalda

New Zealand is advanced on a global scale in generating most of its electricity from renewable sources rather than the less clean, non-renewables such as coal and other fossil fuels.

But in committing to do better, there is an economic price to pay.

New Zealand is a small, advanced but geographically remote First World economy. Renewable electricity generation based on the use of hydro-electricity, geothermal energy and wind power, etc, typically accounts for about 85 per cent of New Zealand’s total electricity generation.

Current Generation

The proportion of renewable sources has been growing steadily in recent years, with the commissioning of new geothermal and wind power stations and the progressive retirement of aging coal and gas-based generation. This trend now includes the planned closure of Contact Energy’s gas-fuelled Otahuhu B Power Station.

With such a high existing renewables component, it is much harder for us to achieve significant reductions in our electricity-related CO2 emissions/kWh than it is for larger, less remote trading partners overseas.

World catching up

Governments are committed to creating a new international climate agreement at the United Nations in Paris this coming December. In preparation, governments have agreed to publicly outline what climate actions they intend to take post-2020. These are their Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs), which will largely determine whether the world achieves an ambitious 2015 agreement and is put on a path towards a low-carbon, climate-resilient future.

In its INDC, New Zealand has committed to reduce GHG emissions to 30 per cent below 2005 levels, in the next 15 years by 2030. The likely cost to the New Zealand economy of meeting the 2030 target in terms of GDP is greater than that implied by other governments’ targets. This is due to a number of factors, such as already achieving a high (+/- 85 per cent) level of renewable electricity generation, plus the fact that almost half of New Zealand’s emissions originate from agriculture.

The emission reduction pathways on which other countries’ targets are based differ from the pathways possible for New Zealand.

A significant part of both the US and the EU commitments is based on opportunities for reducing the carbon-intensity of electricity generation. The current proportion of electricity generated from renewable sources in the US is 13 per cent, and in the EU is 25 per cent. Clearly there is significant scope for CO2 emission reductions in both those major economies through further increases in renewable electricity generation, particularly as much of that will substitute for electricity currently generated from coal.

Already, the mix of renewables and non-renewables used in electricity generation is changing globally.

Back in May, BloombergBusiness in the US reported that, “The race for renewable generation has just passed a turning point. The world is now adding more capacity for renewable power each year than coal, natural gas and oil combined”.

It also advised that, “solar power makes up less than 1 per cent of the electricity market today but could be the world’s biggest energy source by 2050 according to the International Energy Agency. The question is not if the world will transition to cleaner energy, but how long it will take.”

The New Zealand emissions trading scheme (ETS) is due to be reviewed this year. Achievement of our INDC highlights the need to address our domestic policies. It is clear the current ETS will not, on its own, ensure New Zealand’s progression to a sustainable, low-carbon economy.

Supporting sector-specific policies and measures are also required. It may be that some sectors should be included in a different way in the ETS.

Tips for NZ businesses

New Zealand business customers of electricity and gas need to focus on:
• Price minimisation – by checking the market systematically via a professional procurement process and bulk purchasing power.
• Usage optimisation – by monitoring usage in detail, highlighting potential kWh reductions and then taking effective action utilising energy specialists.
• Wider environmental considerations (for large organisations at least).

Large organisations, whether public or privately-owned, need to consider their environmental impact on the wider community, and especially their contribution to lowering greenhouse gas emissions (GHG), particularly CO2.

Richard Gardiner is managing director of Total Utilities Management Group Ltd, email [email protected]
Hans Buwalda is managing director of Environment Health & Safety Consult, email [email protected]

(more…)

Renewable Energy Has Just Passed a Turning Point

People-Widmill2According to BloombergBusiness in the USA:

‘The race for renewable energy has just passed a turning point. The world is now adding more capacity for renewable power each year than coal, natural gas and oil combined. And there’s no going back’.

‘The shift occurred in 2013, when the world added 143 gigawatts of renewable electricity capacity, compared with 141 gigawatts in new plants that burn fossil fuels. The shift will continue to accelerate and by 2030 more than four times as much renewable capacity will be added’.

‘The price of wind and solar power continues to plummet and is now on par or cheaper than grid electricity in many areas of the world. Solar, the newest major source of energy in the mix, makes up less than 1% of the electricity market today but could be the world’s biggest source by 2050, according to the International Energy agency’.

‘The question is not if the world will transition to cleaner energy, but how long it will take’.

(more…)

Commerce Commission Rules on Unfair Terms

contracts

The recent Commerce Commission ‘ruling’ on Unfair Contract Terms for utilities is great news for businesses.

Total Utilities has been negotiating utility agreements since 1999 and a recurring bugbear for us in the past 16 years has been the use of automatic contract roll-over and right of renewal/price-matching provisions by some suppliers to constrain effective competition.

Put bluntly, these clauses have been used as a ‘hospital pass’ by the suppliers in question to avoid a level competitor playing field – especially in the waste services/recyclables and natural gas markets.

As of 16 March 2015, the applicable new agreements must not include such clauses (i.e. Unfair Contract Terms).

It must be emphasised however that these contract clauses are still allowed if existing supply/service agreements are renewed for a further term.

The implications of this are very clear, businesses should negotiate brand new agreements covering the utilities etc in question – don’t just roll your existing agreement on the basis of unchanged contract terms and conditions.

Reference should be made to the Commerce Commission website for full details of their ruling. A PDF of the ruling can be downloaded here.

Monitoring service helps schools simplify utilities management

Stock market graphs.An automated utilities monitoring service has been developed by Total Utilities to assist High Schools and Colleges spending more than $100,000/year on electricity, gas or computing and telecoms.

The new monitoring service will simplify financial management of utilities by generating and displaying usage reports to help identify trends.  This will allow School Business Managers to quickly pinpoint any issues and will make investment and strategy decision-making more accurate, according to Mike Ette of Total Utilities.

“Many High Schools and Colleges struggle with the financial management of their utilities,” said Mike.  “It’s difficult to know if you are getting value from these services if they are not monitored and measured.  Once Business Managers can identify trends, it becomes easy to ask key questions like – is the usage increase in line with changes in the school? Or – nothing has changed so why is usage going up?” (more…)

Schools work together to pay less for their power

Image-TotalUtilities-SchoolsSchools pay less for power by going to the market in bulk tenders which attract contract offers from multiple power suppliers.  In the first six months of this year, Total Utilities has helped a group of seventeen schools save more than $350,000 on their renegotiated power contracts.  This represents an average saving of almost $14,500 or 18% per school.

The bulk tender process was managed by procurement specialists, Total Utilities.  All the school business managers had to do was supply details of their previous contract and weigh up the offers when they came in.

New Plymouth Girls High School was one of the participating schools and business manager Tony Pugh is delighted with the result.  “This is our third contract negotiation with Total Utilities and we’ve saved money every time,” Tony explained.  “This year we cut our power costs by 24% by getting more suppliers interested in quoting for our business and making the most of favourable contract terms.”

In the past Tony has had difficulties attracting such a wide range of offers.  “It’s important to present the information to suppliers using the right language in order to get the best result – it can be very time-consuming to manage the process.  Total Utilities was able to present us with eight offers from different suppliers, lay them out on a single page and recommend the best contract to us – based on dollars and contract terms.” (more…)